Search for: "GOODWIN v. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
In Matter of A.L. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am
Michele Goodwin is a chancellor’s professor at the University of California, Irvine, and the author of Policing the Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
(David Zimmer and Benjamin Hayes of Goodwin Procter drafted and filed the brief on our behalf.) [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 7:01 am
(David Zimmer and Benjamin Hayes of Goodwin Procter, to whom we are very grateful, drafted and filed the brief, which we rely on here in part.) [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 3:50 pm
Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 8:13 am
State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:00 am
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:30 pm
Part II describes how courts have widely used the test from Jacobson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
Miss United States of America, LLC. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 8:38 am
Christopher Goodwin & Assoc., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm
Goodwin, Society Trustee, interviews Paul DeForest Hicks. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm
Goodwin v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 6:08 am
Robert Brown, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, on Friday, March 12, 2021 Tags: Accountability, Accounting, Accounting standards, Audits, Bebchuk v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 8:03 am
See Wheby v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
Emerging areas in Psychology, Data, and Statistical Sciences Gary Marchant, Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law and Ethics, at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, moderated panelists: Xiao-Li Meng, the Whipple V. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 2:20 pm
In Chavis v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:03 am
Cydney Posner’s blog provides a good overview of the lawsuit and notes that it’s patterned after the lawsuit challenging California’s board gender diversity law, SB 826: Framed as a “taxpayer suit” much like Crest v. [read post]
