Search for: "GRASSO v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2007, 7:17 am
Yesterday the First Department dismissed four of six claims against former New York Stock Exchange chairman Richard Grasso finding that former Attorney General Spitzer lacked the authority to bring them (People of the State of New York, by Eliot Spitzer, the Attorney Gen. of the State of New York v Grasso, 2007 NY Slip Op 03990). [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 8:21 am
Administrative decisions and actions must be made in compliance to the lawCimino v Grasso, Decisions of the Commissioner of Education, #14,319Michael J. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
Congratulations to Samantha Barbas, University at Buffalo Law, on her receipt of an NEH grant for a "sociolegal history of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 12:59 am
Grasso, defendant-appellant NEW YORK COUNTYSchools and Education Court Rejects Parents' Challenge to New York City Education Department's Cell Phone Ban in Schools Price v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 8:08 am
The third type of problem, exercise of power of without authority, is suggested by the Appellate Division's decision Tuesday in People of the State of New York, by Eliot Spitzer, the Attorney Gen. of the State of New York v Grasso, 2007 NY Slip Op 03990. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An unsworn report from an expert does not constitute competent evidence to support a motion for summary judgment (see Grasso v Angerami, 79NY2d 813, 814-815 [1991]). [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:19 am by Giles Peaker
Unfortunately, Mr Grasso had sent emails to prospective tenants stating “The licence may sound like a “concentration camp” but please don’t get spooked by those draconian rules. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:10 am by Jeffrey Kahn
  Justice Brennan, dissenting from the 5-4 opinion in Abel v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 3:51 am
With respect to plaintiff's remaining claims, he has failed to state a cause of action for fraud, and no private right of action exists for perjury, tampering with documents, obstruction of justice, and frivolous pleadings (see [*2]Newin Corp. v Hartford Acc. [read post]