Search for: "GRAY v. GRAY"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2009, 9:05 am
Gray v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 11:01 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:31 pm
Gray v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 1:22 pm
An injured fisherman was medevaced to Grays Harbor in Westport on Monday, June 18th after sustaining a severe hand injury while working aboard F/V Myrna Lynn. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 1:22 pm
An injured fisherman was medevaced to Grays Harbor in Westport on Monday, June 18th after sustaining a severe hand injury while working aboard F/V Myrna Lynn. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:39 pm
As demonstrated in a recent case from the Southern District of New York, Zip International Group, LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:08 am
Here is the abstract: In United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 1:59 am
Grays Timber Products Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners Supreme Court “In assessing whether employment-related securities had been disposed of for a price which exceeded their market value, so as to occasion a charge to income tax, it was necessary to postulate a notional sale between a hypothetical vendor and purchaser, with the personal characteristics of the actual vendor, such as his right under a subscription agreement to a disproportionately large part of the… [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:34 am
Gray v Thames Trains Ltd [2009] UKHL 33; [2009] WLR (D) 195 “A person who, as a result of a railway accident, suffered post-traumatic stress disorder which led him to kill someone, could not, as part of his claim for damages in negligence against the train operators responsible for the accident, recover damages for loss of [...] [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 11:00 am
In Gray v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:51 am
Gray v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another; Coogan v Same [2011] EWHC 349 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 65 “The words ‘technical or commercial information’ in the definition of ‘intellectual property’ in section 72(5) of the Senior Courts Act 1981, section 72 (1) of which provided for the withdrawal of privilege against self or spousal incrimination in proceedings for, inter alia, infringement of rights pertaining to any intellectual property, meant… [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 2:05 am
Grays Timber Products Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2010] UKSC 4; [ 2010] WLR (D) 21 “In assessing whether employment-related securities had been disposed of for a consideration which exceeded their ‘market value’, so as to occasion a charge to income tax, it was necessary to postulate a notional sale between a hypothetical vendor and purchaser, with the personal characteristics of the actual vendor, such as his right under a subscription agreement to a… [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
Yesterday's judgment in this case is interesting: their Lordships have decided that Kerrie Gray, who was injured in the Ladbroke Grove rail crash of 1999, cannot recover damages in negligence from Thames Trains and Network Rail for the consequences of his own criminal acts. [read post]
24 May 2009, 4:24 am
" Gray v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
Westchester attorney Lisa Fantino says SCOTUS ruling in Omega v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 6:43 am
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Recorded telephone conversations Henry Jefferson Gray, appellant, was convicted by a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Queen Anne’s County of three counts of conspiracy: conspiracy to distribute cocaine, conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute, and conspiracy to possess cocaine. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:26 pm
For instance, in Caterpillar, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:25 am
Gray v Thames Trains Ltd and Another House of Lords “A claimant who, as a result of a railway accident caused by the defendants' negligence, suffered post-traumatic stress disorder which led him to kill someone, could not recover damages for loss of earnings following his detention, in prison and in mental hospital, after the killing. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 8:08 am
Here is the opinion in Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 10:02 am
Here is the abstract: In Graham v. [read post]
