Search for: "GRIMES et al v. AT&T et al"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
Here is a recap of September’s filings: Edwards, et al. v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 5:24 am
In the recent case of Grimes v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 4:17 am
In Armour Pipe Line Company et al v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:23 am
Ware, et al., “Statistics in Medicine — Reporting of Subgroup Analyses in Clinical Trials,” 357 New Engl. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:30 am
Sonya Castillo, et al v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am
Hovenkamp et al. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:08 pm
Zuckerberg, et al., 2021 WL _______ (Del. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
