Search for: "Gaines v. Chew" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2009, 11:17 am
S596aCivil rights -- Search and seizure -- Qualified immunity -- Under two-step procedure for resolving government officials' qualified immunity claims mandated by Court in Saucier v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 4:53 am by Russ Bensing
  Jennifer Curry found that out when she died after chewing one that her friend Jenny Krieger had sold her. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 2:03 pm by familoo
I replied that I would rather chew on my left testicle than assist a solicitor profit from child trafficking. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
In this piece I will discuss how if at all this provision has been altered by the case of Proctor and Gamble v Office for Harmonisation In the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) ; Known simply as "Baby Dry"; and subsequent cases. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
Dogs were first used by the police in the early 1900s, and by the 1950s the modern era of police dog use was underway in the United States (Dorriety, Police Service Dogs in the Use-of-Force Continuum (2005) 16 Criminal Justice Policy Review 88). [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
App. 2006) (affirming summary judgment against plaintiff who abused OTC athsma by taking excessive quantities "to lose weight and gain energy"); Pappas v. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Each of the scholars who posted reactions to Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic engaged the book with insight and verve, and collectively they have given us a lot to chew on. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 10:11 am by Michael Ginsborg
Lyndon Johnson said of Gerald Ford that "he couldn't chew gum and walk straight at the same time. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Farley & Others (IP Whiteboard) Something to chew on: the Food Channel trade mark cases: Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
Farley & Others (IP Whiteboard) Something to chew on: the Food Channel trade mark cases: Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v. [read post]