Search for: "Galvin v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2010, 8:07 am
We affirm the circuit court's refusal to permit Galvin [...] [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm
As the secretary of state, Galvin is the state’s register of deeds. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:21 am
Galvin (09-920). [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 12:16 pm
(Opinion, United States Supreme Court)Massachusetts Superior Court Denies Secretary of State Galvin's Motion Against RobinhoodRobinhood Financial, LLC. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:53 pm
Via SCOTUSBlog, comes this invitation brief expressing the United States's views on whether the Court should take Simmons v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 3:18 am
Galvin v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 6:50 am
Galvin, March 30, 2022, Ricciuti, M.).Massachusetts v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:18 am
In their ongoing court challenge to the rule, regulators from Massachusetts and Montana argued that the SEC’s amendments to Regulation A violate the plain meaning of the Securities Act, overstep the Commission’s delegated authority, and strip investors of valuable state law protections (Lindeen v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 11:42 am
Galvin (09-920), recommending that the Court deny certiorari. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:02 am
Galvin, and No. 09-923, Arar v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:07 am
SEC, May 22, 2015, Galvin v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 10:34 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
The female driver, Valantein V. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
The female driver, Valantein V. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
The female driver, Valantein V. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 7:17 pm
Galvin. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:40 am
Secretary of State William Galvin claims Cabot Investment Properties LLC and its principals, Carlton P. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
SEC and Galvin v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:59 pm
Galvin is on conference for Friday. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 5:57 am
In May 2015, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin and Montana State Auditor Monica Lindeen filed separate petitions with the court, requesting judicial review of the legality of the Commission’s expansion of the exemptions available under Regulation A. [read post]
