Search for: "Garcetti v. Ceballos" Results 141 - 160 of 275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2012, 5:45 am
Citing Garcetti v Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410, the Circuit Court explained that "[W]hen public employees make statements pursuant to their official duties, the employees are not speaking as citizens for First Amendment purposes, and the Constitution does not insulate their communications from employer discipline. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
If you've been following First Amendment law over the last few years, you may be wondering if this case survives a recent Supreme Court ruling, Garcetti v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:04 pm by Keith E. Whittington
The majority held that professorial speech in department meetings and the like is speech pursuant to their job duties under Garcetti v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 1:59 pm
In analyzing whether Reilly had the claimed First Amendment right, the Third Circuit cited Garcetti v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm by Alice O'Brien
” The lower courts have largely taken Garcetti, and its predecessor precedent, 1968’s Pickering v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 1:17 pm by Richard Renner
That argument could support Sommer if he were to claim that his email was made in his personal capacity and protected under Garcetti v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:17 am
The latter was the issue in the Thomas case: Was Thomas’s report to the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation (OSBI) made pursuant to his professional duties and therefore outside the scope of First Amendment protections within the meaning of Garcetti v Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410, or was his speech a matter of public interest and thus protected by the First Amendment? [read post]