Search for: "Garcia v. Garcia"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2007, 2:33 pm
SEARCH & SEIZURE United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:51 pm
Thanks to a reader who alerted us to this North County Times article reporting that Lawrence Hutchins III of United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 3:12 pm
Garcia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 4:08 pm
Supreme Court in Leal Garcia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:30 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Habeas Opinions Body: AC33827 - Garcia v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 10:01 am
Garcia,No. 06-3222, ___ F.3d ___ (10th Cir. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Some applications have been pending for two years, according to the suit.This has prevented Garcia from traveling to religious meetings outside the United States, infringing on his religious freedom, the lawsuit said.In O Centro Espirita Beneficente União do Vegetal in the U.S. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:15 am
The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday, sitting en banc, heard arguments in Garcia v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 4:26 pm
The union v. crime lab tension hadn't occurred to me before.Garcia suggested that the adversarial legal system stands at odds with improving forensic science, citing the FSC's experience with the Todd Willingham arson case as a prime example. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 8:37 am
From the Supreme Court's statement in Noem v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
Garland and Garland v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 4:05 am
Garcia-Arcos, 2010 U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 7:40 am
Garcia. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 4:05 am
As previously reported, last month in Garcia v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 6:32 am
Still working on a long post on Garcia v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:47 am
Garcia v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:51 pm
Back in last December, Ben told usabout the US Ninth Circuit's en banc hearing of the Garcia v Google appeal. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:20 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:12 pm
No, says the Indiana Court of Appeals in Garcia-Torres v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 7:00 pm
See Champagne Louis Roederer v. [read post]