Search for: "Garcia v. Lee" Results 81 - 100 of 128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2014, 3:12 pm by Corynne McSherry
It's an old legal adage that bad facts lead to bad legal decisions, and today we've got a classic example in Garcia v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:48 am by Ron Coleman
UPDATE:  Per PACER, the case was settled on undisclosed terms in 2007, though not before generating the opinion in Sobini Films v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:32 am by Joel R. Brandes
Lee, 224 F.Supp.2d 843, 845-46, n. 3 & 851, n. 12 (D.N.J.2002)(due to the expert's unavailability, the proceeding was bifurcated), aff'd, 329 F.3d 3300 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 967 (2003); see Garcia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am by Dan Markel
California: From a Revolutionary Constitutional Doctrine to a Modest Ban on Status Crimes *Erik Luna (Washington and Lee University) The Story of Berry: When Hot Blood Cools *Susan D. [read post]
18 May 2012, 9:43 am
Ct.), with introductory note by Elizabeth Stubbins Bates Garcia v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Dole, 483 U.S. 203 (1987), no longer applies; (2) whether Congress may treat states no differently from any other employer when imposing invasive mandates as to the manner in which they provide their own employees with insurance coverage, as suggested by Garcia v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am by cdw
” Humberto Leal Garcia v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:51 am by Will Aitchison
Citing what it believed to be the relatively low turnout in the FLSA opt-in class, a Court denied Rule 23 certification of a state wage and hour claim in Garcia v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]