Search for: "Garcia v. Lee"
Results 81 - 100
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 3:12 pm
It's an old legal adage that bad facts lead to bad legal decisions, and today we've got a classic example in Garcia v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
Copyright: Baker v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:48 am
UPDATE: Per PACER, the case was settled on undisclosed terms in 2007, though not before generating the opinion in Sobini Films v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
Lee, 224 F.Supp.2d 843, 845-46, n. 3 & 851, n. 12 (D.N.J.2002)(due to the expert's unavailability, the proceeding was bifurcated), aff'd, 329 F.3d 3300 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 967 (2003); see Garcia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:56 pm
Mixed Ruling in Sergio Tax Case Sergio Garcia v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm
Manhattan U.S. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am
California: From a Revolutionary Constitutional Doctrine to a Modest Ban on Status Crimes *Erik Luna (Washington and Lee University) The Story of Berry: When Hot Blood Cools *Susan D. [read post]
18 May 2012, 9:43 am
Ct.), with introductory note by Elizabeth Stubbins Bates Garcia v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:23 am
Schwarzenegger (now Perry v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 6:48 pm
* Turner v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:30 am
Holder, 649 F.3d 397 (5th Cir. 2011). 6th Circuit: Garcia-Flores v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
Holder, 649 F.3d 397 (5th Cir. 2011). 6th Circuit: Garcia-Flores v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Dole, 483 U.S. 203 (1987), no longer applies; (2) whether Congress may treat states no differently from any other employer when imposing invasive mandates as to the manner in which they provide their own employees with insurance coverage, as suggested by Garcia v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:11 am
” See Lee H. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
” Humberto Leal Garcia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
In Medellin v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:51 am
Citing what it believed to be the relatively low turnout in the FLSA opt-in class, a Court denied Rule 23 certification of a state wage and hour claim in Garcia v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
