Search for: "Gardner v State of New York" Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2016, 6:07 am by John Hochfelder
State of New York (4th Dept. 2015) almost all of the damages findings have been affirmed on appeal. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hence, even setting aside the inconsistencies between petitioner's testimony and the description of the incident as set forth in the relevant incident reports, which presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer and respondent to resolve (see Matter of Verille v Gardner, 177 AD3d 1068, 1070 [2019]; Matter of Angelino v New York State Comptroller, 176 AD3d at 1379; see also Matter of Harris v New York… [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 2:36 pm by Howard Bashman
“Lindsay Lohan, ‘Mob Wives’ star lose bids to sue Grand Theft Auto V makers over allegedly using their likenesses”: Kenneth Lovett of The New York Daily News has this report. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:36 am by John Hochfelder
State of New York (4th Dept. 2012) [Peter Grevelding is the named claimant as he was the executor of the estate of Mr. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 8:23 pm
City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 404 N.E.2d 718 (1980), is one of the most frequently cited cases in New York. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 8:28 am by Howard Friedman
New York State Department of Correctional Services, 2011 U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
No. 6 of Towns of Islip & Smithtown v New York State Div. of Human Rights Appeal Bd., 35 NY2d 371, 380, rearg denied 36 NY2d 807). _____________________ The 2012 edition of the Discipline Book is now availableTo learn more about this concise guide to disciplinary actions involving public employees in New York State click on http://thedisciplinebook.blogspot.com/_____________________ The decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:08 am
" Other cases addressing use immunity include Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:25 am
Gardner v Broderick, 392 US 273 and People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326 discuss the parameters of immunity in connection with compelling a public officer or employee to answer questions concerning his or her performance of official duties.If, however, an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent the fact that he or she answered falsely from being used against the individual if he or she is… [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
The plaintiff alleged discrimination in violation of Title VII and related New York state laws. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 2:10 pm by Jordan Brunner
William Ford posted the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in IRAP v. [read post]