Search for: "Gardner v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 526
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2014, 3:13 am
Garcia v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am
If that were the case we would not have had decisions such as S & Marper v UK – which declared unlawful the indefinite retention of DNA samples by police of individuals who had not been convicted of any offences. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am
If that were the case we would not have had decisions such as S & Marper v UK – which declared unlawful the indefinite retention of DNA samples by police of individuals who had not been convicted of any offences. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
Rules v. standards—some carveouts are one, some the other. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
Gardner, A. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 4:10 am
In Cortes v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
" See Gardner v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 7:50 am
”) Additional coverage (& h/t): BET Wins Legal War Over Fan’s Facebook Page (Eriq Gardner) Case citation: Mattocks v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 4:06 pm
As Justice Gardner noted in People v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Under those circumstances, handcuffing and patting down Gardner for the officer’s safety was not unreasonable, and was justified under Terry v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 11:22 pm
It was 26 years ago, in State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:46 pm
Gardner v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 10:58 am
Gardner v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 8:23 pm
Bower & Gardner, 46 N.Y.2d 765, 767, 413 N.Y.S.2d 650, 386 N.E.2d 258; Platzman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
Interesting procedural note that is also somewhat of a shocker: as noted in this piece from Eriq Gardner, Google received an order in advance of the ruling requiring it to take down the video and not say anything about this. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm
Gardner 13-379Issue: Whether New York prevailing wage rates are minimum labor standards under Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 1:40 pm
In Gardner v Florida, it was held that even though sentencing is a critical stage of a criminal proceeding, the full panoply of constitutional rights is not applied to the sentencing process. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
In Gardner v Florida, it was held that even though sentencing is a critical stage of a criminal proceeding, the full panoply of constitutional rights is not applied to the sentencing process. [read post]
