Search for: "Gardner v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 567
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2020, 6:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, “[a]ny qualification in the pleading thereof by use of the words ‘to the effect’, ‘substantially’, or words of similar import generally renders the complaint defective” (Gardner v Alexander Rent-A-Car, Inc., 28 AD2d 667, 667 [1st Dept 1967]). [read post]
16 May 2009, 6:30 pm
  In one of the battered woman syndrome cases, State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:56 am by Charon QC
Not given to hyperbole or persuaded by political grandstanding – I am interested in the hard law behind the judgment, why the decision is so important for ‘freedom of speech’, whether the DPP was misconceived  in bringing the prosecution as solicitor David Allen Green has stated (in fact he went further and described it as ‘disgraceful’ in an interview with Head of Legal blogger Carl Gardner), and whether the judgment really clarifies the law for… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:22 am by Adam Wagner
Carl Gardner, of the Head of Legal blog, also provides an excellent post here. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:09 am by Tessa Shepperson
Goldsbrough v CA Property Management Ltd Mr and Mrs Gardner, the owners of the property in question, had granted a lease for five years to CA Property Management Ltd. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Gardner 13-379Issue: Whether New York prevailing wage rates are minimum labor standards under Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States, 730 F.3d 1206 (10th Cir. 2013) (favoring individual Indians in trust dispute with federal government) Gardner v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Actually, I have no idea if they helped or not but we’ll give them some credit anyway. v. # 15 Tribal Law and Policy Institute Always been a big fan of Jerry Gardner and his crew. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Ultimately, the court says that lesser mental states do not support a finding of contributory liability. [read post]