Search for: "Gardner v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 586
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm
" Back in the United States, politicians are walking on eggshells. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 7:34 am
India had thus run afoul of its TRIPs obligations; The United States Trade Representative reacted swiftly to the situation and asked for ‘consultations’ to being on the 2nd of July, 1996 and when those consultations did not result in any result, the USTR requested the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) to create a panel to hear the dispute. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:56 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:36 am
In the courts RT (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 38Supreme Court: asylum seekers cannot be expected to lie or dissemble in order to achieve safety in their own country. ? [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 6:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:56 am
Not given to hyperbole or persuaded by political grandstanding – I am interested in the hard law behind the judgment, why the decision is so important for ‘freedom of speech’, whether the DPP was misconceived in bringing the prosecution as solicitor David Allen Green has stated (in fact he went further and described it as ‘disgraceful’ in an interview with Head of Legal blogger Carl Gardner), and whether the judgment really clarifies the law for… [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 4:50 am
Gardner v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
In Martin Heller v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:26 am
In Martin Heller v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
Gardner Mach. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
But it’s the lawyers who are dominant in business in the United States*. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
Last year, the 9th Circuit decided in UMG v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:53 am
Max Gardner for providing content for this article. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm
Ruhul Anam, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2) [2012] EWHC 1770 (Admin) High Court reviews principles of assessment of damages in unlawful detention cases, rules that 2 years of substantive damages are to be awarded to prisoner. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 5:40 am
Gardner v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm
” Natasha Phillips of Researching Reform writes: Government wants to end Blame Culture – By Blaming Others 11 KBW in Panopticon: Important new privacy judgment: police retention of protestor’s data not an Article 8 infringement The Admin Court (Gross LJ and Irwin J) has handed down judgment this week in Catt v Association of Chief Police Officers and Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 1471 (Admin). [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:03 am
”** In addition, the employee’s failure to object to the absence of such written designation “is of no moment, inasmuch as this jurisdictional defect cannot be waived,” said the court, citing Gardner v Coxsackie-Athens Cent. [read post]
31 May 2012, 4:47 am
Mohammed Othman v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 28 May 2012 – read judgment This was a further application for bail to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) after the appellant had failed in his application to the Grand Chamber of the Strasbourg Court earlier this month, but had launched an appeal to be heard by SIAC, against the Home Secretary’s refusal to revoke his deportation order. [read post]
27 May 2012, 9:07 am
In the courts Scoppola v Italy (No. 3) – 126/05 [2012] ECHR 868 (22 May 2012). [read post]
