Search for: "Gardner v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 586
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2012, 5:50 am
In Gardner v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
No. 6 of Towns of Islip & Smithtown v New York State Div. of Human Rights Appeal Bd., 35 NY2d 371, 380, rearg denied 36 NY2d 807). _____________________ The 2012 edition of the Discipline Book is now availableTo learn more about this concise guide to disciplinary actions involving public employees in New York State click on http://thedisciplinebook.blogspot.com/_____________________ The decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm
And let’s go for a hat trick of good reads (not that the blog posts which I refer to below are not good reads… they are… but Carl Gardner, on his Head of Legal blog, writes: Supreme Court judgment: Sugar v BBC “The Supreme Court has today given judgment in this case, about the extent to which the Freedom of Information Act 2000 applies to information the BBC holds for journalistic purposes…. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:53 am
Cet évènement a pour objectif d’alimenter un débat dans une optique mondiale, détachée du cadre national. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
Carl Gardner has an excellent post on the case here. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
The Government of the United States of America v Richard O’Dwyer. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 9:05 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
” Emphasizing the dispute over state-federal relations in Arizona v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
HM (Iraq) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1536 (13 December 2011) December 13, 2011 Iraq country guidance immigration tribunal decision quashed as 2 parties not represented. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
It is of course open to member states to provide for rights more generous than those guaranteed by the Convention, but such provision should not be the product of interpretation of the Convention by national courts, since the meaning of the Convention should be uniform throughout the states party to it. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:29 pm
Consalvo v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:55 am
The case, Pearson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am
Sapkota v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Court of Appeal case about segregation of immigration decisions – by the Free Movement Blog. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:17 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
I will be writing more about the UCC Article 3 v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:02 am
The Ninth Circuit denied rehearing en banc in Chism v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am
This week, in State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
(United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:55 am
Co., LLC v. [read post]
