Search for: "Garland v. Downes" Results 1 - 20 of 299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  The role of the court is to apply law to the facts of the case before it – not to legislate, not to arrogate to itself the executive power, not to hand down advisory opinion on the issues of the day. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
   That was in the case of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am by Wells C. Bennett
Again Judge Griffith stops Sullivan, and notes that Judge Walton didn’t hand down as broad of a ruling as Urbina did in Khairkhwa, right? [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:53 am by Raffaela Wakeman
It’s eventually the court, in the voice of Chief Judge Garland, who boils down Jaskol’s point about No-Name: knowing the source of the blood in the car is the straw that broke the camel’s back—the camel being No-Name’s credibility, of course. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:22 am by Edith Roberts
” In Prawfsblog, Jack Preis discusses Manuel v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am by jonathanturley
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has handed down a major opinion in Cargill v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
Garland – 5th Circuit Court of Appeal (9-27-21) Kahumbu v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 5:15 am by Timothy P. Flynn
President Obama, having nominated federal appeals court judge Merrick Garland, was already a lame duck and could not get the Senate to provide the advice and consent required by the U. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:31 am by Alistair Simmons
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit struck down the ban after siding with the plaintiffs in Cargill v. [read post]