Search for: "Garner v. State of Alabama*"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2015, 7:51 am
Exceptional Child Center, in which a divided Court held that Medicaid providers do not have a cause of action to challenge a state’s reimbursement rates, garnered considerable coverage and commentary. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
., but last week’s decisions continue to garner commentary. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
” Justice Elena Kagan garnered just enough votes in Madison v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 8:10 pm
Nor, the state continues, is certiorari warranted based either on the prospect of overruling the Court's decision in Murray v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:10 pm
TV Censorship – FCC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Alabama Department of Revenue, which asks whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors from a generally applicable sales tax constitutes discrimination against railroads; and Flores-Villar v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
The bill comes in response to a recent decision by the Maryland Court of Appeals in DeWolfe v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 5:55 am
Case background and decision The plaintiff in Kleber v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Spotlight on Florida SB 264 Of the various bills that have been introduced, Florida Senate Bill 264 (2023) (“SB 264”), has garnered significant attention as it is one of the most restrictive of this new wave of legislation.[5] SB 264 was codified at Florida Statutes § 692.201–.204, and took effect on July 1, 2023. [read post]
12 May 2016, 9:13 am
While the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act is garnering a great deal of attention, it’s worthwhile to remember that state law remains critically important in drafting restrictive covenants. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
And that omission, Stuart contended, was inconsistent with Bullcoming v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am
” At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief, as well as the issues at stake more broadly, in next Term’s North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am
SCOTUS has come down with its first opinion of the term, holding in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
Today, in McCutcheon v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:03 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 6:37 am
Continuing the post-game analysis of McDonald v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
” For example, in Garner v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
