Search for: "Garrett v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser observes that in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:03 am by John Elwood
(rescheduled before the November 1, 2019, and November 8, 2019, conferences; relisted after the November 15, 2019, November 22, 2019, December 6, 2019, December 13, 2019, January 10, January 17, January 24, February 21, February 28, March 6, March 20, March 27, April 3, April 17 and April 24 conferences) United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674, and United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm by NCC Staff
Delaware’s Weird—and Constitutionally Suspect—Approach to Judicial Independence By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore School of Law Garrett Epps discusses an upcoming Supreme Court case, Carney v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:00 am by NCC Staff
America May Be Nearing the End of the Roe Era By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore School of Law Garrett Epps looks at the Supreme Court’s upcoming abortion case, June Medical Services v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:10 pm by NCC Staff
United States (1993), The Federalist Papers, and a Justice Department memo prove that not allowing witnesses in an impeachment trial would be unconstitutional. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Barr 19-864Issue: Whether the government may permanently deny a mentally healthy, responsible and law-abiding citizen of the United States the opportunity to recover his Second Amendment rights solely because of a long-ago involuntary commitment. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
”To complicate matters, however, a federal statute appears to delegate to the Archivist of the United States the power to decide whether an amendment is valid. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which stems from the federal government’s failure to fully reimburse health insurance companies for losses created as a result of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Moreover, applying the Supreme Court’s 1995 opinion in Wyoming v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Mesa, which “asks whether there is a remedy for a Mexican citizen killed when a Border Patrol agent in the United States opens fire on someone in Mexico,” and Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:47 pm by Ilya Somin
But California's position was greatly strengthened by the Supreme Court's May 2018 ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
 Buckley and Citizens United were well covered; a few added McConnell v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” The third case granted on Friday was United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am by Alicia Maule
Garrett Exonerated: A History of the Innocence Movement by Robert J. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court affirmed a lower-court judgment finding that Congress properly delegated authority to the U.S. attorney general to apply the registration requirements of a sex-offender-registration law, “may presage a coming sea change in judicial review of agency rules implementing broad Congressional directives. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Google is expected to pay a multimillion dollar penalty from the Federal Trade Commission over its handling of kids’ information on its popular video site YouTube. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:42 am
Securities Industry Commentator: A legal, regulatory, and compliance feed curated by veteran Wall Street lawyer Bill Singer http://www.rrbdlaw.com/4696/securities-industry-commentator/United States of America, Appellee, v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the justices voted 7-2 to reaffirm the “separate sovereigns” exception to the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause, allowing federal and state governments to prosecute a defendant for the same conduct. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps writes that last week’s decision in Nieves v. [read post]