Search for: "Gay v. District of Columbia" Results 1 - 20 of 206
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2023, 7:27 pm by Kalvis Golde
Nineteen other states and the District of Columbia have similar laws. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 12:14 am by Frank Cranmer
” Religion and COVID-19 in British Columbia In Beaudoin v British Columbia (Attorney General) 2022 BCCA 427, the Court of Appeal unanimously upheld orders of British Columbia’s Provincial Health Officer [PHO] in 2020 and 2021 prohibiting in-person worship services. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Jackson Women’s Health Organization)—Justice Kavanaugh joined the majority opinion but also added a narrower gloss via a concurring opinion; he was the only Justice to do so in both cases.In Bruen he reminded that New York’s law was vulnerable largely because it conferred too much discretion on bureaucrats, a flaw that could be fixed (and has been fixed by more than 40 other states), and he repeated language from the seminal District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:37 pm by Josh Blackman
 S. 1 (1967), for example, involved a couple who was criminally prosecutedfor marrying in the District of Columbia and cohabiting in Virginia, id., at 2–3. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 6:39 am
Marital Agreements and Adoption for Same-Sex Spouses All 50 states and the District of Columbia legally recognize same-sex marriage. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:29 am by Eugene Volokh
The policy "prohibit[s]" similar speech that relates not just to race or sex, but also to "age, … disability, family responsibilities, gender identity and expression, genetic information, marital status, national origin and accent, personal appearance, political affiliation, pregnancy, … religion, … sexual orientation, source of income, veteran's status or other factors prohibited by federal and/or District of Columbia law. [read post]
31 May 2022, 2:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc. (1995) (parade organizer); Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
That was the clear message of the Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
Law professor at Columbia Law School, Jamal Greene, wrote that the legal question the Court presented—whether the Colorado anti-discrimination law impermissibly forces the web designer “to speak or stay silent”—is “too broad. [read post]