Search for: "Geier v. American Honda Motor Co" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2016, 8:01 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861; 98-1811 (2000) 2000 Category: Personal injury; preemption Continue Reading [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 8:01 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861; 98-1811 (2000) 2000 Category: Personal injury; preemption Continue Reading [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:45 am
American Honda Motor Co, and that the family should be allowed to pursue their product liability case to its end. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by Sean Moloney
The Supreme Court, in Geier v American Honda Motor Co., found the state claim preempted because the DOT had purposely given manufacturers a choice to install airbags or automatic seatbelts due to safety-related concerns about consumers’ acceptance of new restraint technology.   [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm by Kali Borkoski
American Honda Motor Co. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:20 am by Bexis
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), the first major implied preemption decision in the product liability field, might be overruled.  [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:37 am by Kali Borkoski
American Honda Motor Co. – holding that a plaintiff could not sue Honda for its failure to install airbags in a 1987 Honda – played a key role at oral argument. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:58 am by Bexis
Williamson will decide the continuing reach of Geier v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:21 am by James Beck - Guest
American Honda Motor Co. (2000), holding that an earlier version of FMVSS 208 preempted product liability claims relating to air bags.  [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000). [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:46 am by Bexis
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), and Freightliner Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
Hyundai Motor Co. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1672. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
American Honda Motor Co., the Court held that the very same statute and federal regulation at issue in Williamson did preempt a state tort lawsuit that would effectively remove a manufacturer option, in that case airbags as opposed to other passive restraints. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:16 pm
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), as involving "formal rulemaking and then. . .a plan to phase in a mix of [options]. [read post]