Search for: "General Box Co. v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
  As stated in Moore’s Federal Practice, “The identity of class members must be ascertainable by reference to objective criteria. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:00 pm by Shirin Sinnar
  For those not within the United States, some individuals with substantial connections to the United States may have some protection. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am by Samuel Bray
An example of this that I discuss in Multiple Chancellors is Panama Refining Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:17 am by Miriam Seifter
  (Arlington says this is the same question the Court always asks at “Step Zero” of its Chevron inquiry, pursuant to the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The first marriages by same-sex couples were celebrated in the United States in May 2004, as a result of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 8:48 pm
(TTABlogged here).In re Truck-Lite Co., Serial No. 76532510 (January 26, 2006). [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 8:49 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
” Next, it reviews the standards of “willfulness” as presented by the United States and taxpayer’s counsel, and as determined by the Court in the recent Miami, Florida case which was tried and decided by a jury in Miami, Florida in June, 2014, United States v. [read post]