Search for: "General Ins. Co. v. State Farm Ins. Co." Results 61 - 80 of 409
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2018, 1:40 pm by Colin E. Flora
The Indiana Supreme Court has reminded time and time again that it, not the General Assembly, has sole control over trial procedure in this state. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 1:25 pm by Colin E. Flora
Reopening the evidence would have caused no prejudice to State Farm, nor would it have caused confusion or inconvenience to the trial court or the jury.The result in this case was an unearned $170,000 windfall to State Farm stemming from an inadvertent attorney error that could have been easily and quickly remedied. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
These allegations generally state causes of action sounding in legal malpractice (see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d at 49; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 1.15 [c] [4]), and violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 14 [2014]; cf. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Bow Tie Law
Requests for production arguably generate the most motion practice in discovery. [read post]