Search for: "General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Jackson" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2011, 3:58 pm
General Motors Acceptance Corp., 572 So.2d 1363 (Fla. 1990); Susco Car Rental Sys. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
In contrast, the Eleventh Amendment does not extend to counties and municipal corporations. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:50 pm by Rick Garnett
Schierl / Fort Howard Corporation Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
He accepted Motors’ had a reputation for cars and that it would be called to mind by B62’s use on clothing. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am by John Coyle
That framing recapitulates a key point in Gorsuch’s concurrence in Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
On Wednesday 19 October 2011 there was an application in the case of Tesla Motors v BBC. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
Tim Davie, acting director general, said that redactions were “driven by external legal advice. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 5:27 am
Before they began their work, the business judgment rule generally was seen as a barrier to judicial review of the substantive merits of board decisions. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm by Mark Zamora
However, the court "need not accept as true legal conclusions or unwarranted factual inferences. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
PA Media Lawyer reported on 3 February that the Attorney General was investigating the case, but the Guardian declined to comment. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Ford Motor Co., No. 08-1082 (6th Cir. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by William B. Gould IV
The inability of the United Auto Workers to reverse three plant closings instituted by General Motors dramatizes this protection vacuum all the more. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a person shall be strictly liable for a violation of this subsection upon proof of a violation of subsection b. of N.J.S.2C:29-2 or while operating a motor vehicle in violation of subsection c. of N.J.S.2C:20-10 which resulted in bodily injury to another person; or (7) Attempts to cause significant bodily injury to another or causes significant bodily injury purposely or knowingly or, under circumstances manifesting extreme… [read post]