Search for: "General Motors Corp. v. District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (DC Circuit) rejected a challenge to 2014 EPA rules regulating emission testing requirements for new motor vehicles, 40 C.F.R. [read post]
14 May 2007, 5:23 am
General Motors Corp., --- F.3d ----, 2007 WL 1054697, *1 (5th Cir. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 11:38 am
Washington led 37 other states, the District of Columbia and Commonwealth of Puerto Rico in submitting a "friend of the court" brief to the Court. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:13 pm
General Motors Corp., 133 F.3d 388 (6th Cir. 1998) (en banc), the Sixth Circuit similarly rejected class-wide claims for retiree medical benefits by a class of salaried employees, even though it has freely found for unionized employees asserting similar claims involving a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
March 26, 2014) (District of Columbia) (non-product liability). [read post]
16 May 2018, 6:45 am
The “Frye hearing” was established by the Federal District of Columbia Circuit court in Frye v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
General Motors Corp., 65 P.3d 956, 968-69 (Ariz. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
” Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Backus Hospital, 864 A.2d 1, 18 (Conn. 2005) (rejecting lost chance doctrine altogether).District of Columbia: Grant v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:26 pm
Noerr Motor Freight, 365 U.S. 127 (1961) ("Noerr") and Professional Real Estate Investors v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 2:37 pm
Thirty-six states and the District of Columbia provided color copies of approximately 900 drivers’ license photos. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
District Court for the Eastern District of California 2010); Yokohama Tire Corp. v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 5:06 pm
Hirschbach Motor Lines). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am
Autonomy Corp., PLC, et. al. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 1:01 am
In Hydrogen Tech Corp. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
As to them, however, we adhere to our general rule that we don’t do the other side’s research for them.AlabamaThe Alabama Supreme Court held, in E.R. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
See generally Bexis' book §2.04[1] at footnote 17 (collecting state-of-the-art citations from drug and device cases in 35 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico).So that's one thing - one pretty big thing - that we think is wrong with the anti-preemption rationale in Tucker II. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
Hyundai Motor America, Inc (EDTexweblog.com) District Court S D California: False marking affirmative defenses – Laches & unclean hands are in, advice of Counsel is out: Oakley, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm
Lotus Development Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:07 pm
Columbia Lakes Homeowners Ass'n, 325 S.W.3d 791, 798 (Tex. [read post]
