Search for: "General Motors Corp. v. District of Columbia" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2021, 11:19 am by admin
General Motors Corp., 942 F.Supp. 869, 877 (W.D.N.Y. 1996). [read post]
Subchapter V – Return to Work Reporting Requirement Employers have a method to report if an employee refuses to return to work Plain language about returning to work Subchapter VI – Other Related Provisions and Technical Corrections Pay an extra $100 per week to individuals who have at least $5,000 a year in self-employment income, but are disqualified from receiving Pandemic Unemployment Assistance because they are not eligible for regular state unemployment benefits. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held below, or leaves immunity intact, as the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
An example of this can be found in Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
Detroit,3 the Michigan Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the taking of private property for the construction of a General Motors automotive plant. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am by Lorene Park
On November 3, Microsoft Corp. and the Trustees of Princeton University filed suit in the District of Columbia, claiming Trump’s decision to strip some 800,000 “Dreamers” of their protected status hurts employers and universities too, and that breaking assurances that DACA applicants’ information would not be shared with ICE violated the Administrative Procedure Act and Fifth Amendment. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:13 pm by Greg Mersol
General Motors Corp., 133 F.3d 388 (6th Cir. 1998) (en banc), the Sixth Circuit similarly rejected class-wide claims for retiree medical benefits by a class of salaried employees, even though it has freely found for unionized employees asserting similar claims involving a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (DC Circuit) rejected a challenge to 2014 EPA rules regulating emission testing requirements for new motor vehicles, 40 C.F.R. [read post]