Search for: "General Motors Corp. v. District of Columbia" Results 41 - 60 of 64
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
… It seemed better on all sides to work together,” city General Counsel Cindy Laquidara told board members as she explained the settlement proposal. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
– Michael Aubele, Valley News Dispatch, April 27, 2010 The federal Environmental Protection Agency and Allegheny County Health Department want a federal judge to sign off on an agreement with Allegheny Ludlum Corp. and Harsco Corp. intended to control slag dust at the Ludlum steel mill in Natrona. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
General Motors Corp., 463 F.2d 98, 100 (2d Cir. 1972) (“bare bones statement. . .without any supporting facts permits dismissal”); Jackson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
According to a complaint filed simultaneously with the settlement in federal court in the District of Columbia, between 1998 and 2006, Cummins shipped more than 570,000 heavy duty diesel engines to vehicle equipment manufacturers nationwide without pollution control equipment included, in violation of the Clean Air Act. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
Moreno, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
We blogged about the problems with Guinan here.District of ColumbiaThe very first court to permit medical monitoring absent actual injury was a federal "prediction" of District of Columbia law. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
The District of Columbia does not recognize cross-jurisdictional class action tolling. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
See generally Bexis' book §2.04[1] at footnote 17 (collecting state-of-the-art citations from drug and device cases in 35 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico).So that's one thing - one pretty big thing - that we think is wrong with the anti-preemption rationale in Tucker II. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia (07-141) (filings available here) - the Court evaded a question over the most basic of constitutional provisions: the bicameralism requirement. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (Patent Docs),US: Alnylam CEO forecasts ‘perfect storm’ for biomedical patents: (Patent Docs),US: Human Genome launches patent suit against Genentech over type of protein used to detect tumours: (IP Law360)Pharma & Biotech - ProductsCaduet (Atorvastatin/Amlodipine) – US: Pfizer sues Ranbaxy to block generic Caduet until 2016: (IP Law360),Dovonex (Calcipotriol) – Chancery Division EWHC grants interim injunction prohibiting Sandoz from… [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
India: Gene silencing: (Spicy IP), India: US Patent reform implications for Indian Pharma: (Spicy IP), India: Generic pharmaceutical industry in the spotlight: (International Law Office), India: Supreme Court refuses to stay a Gujarat High Court decision restraining Ranbaxy from airing its controversial ads directed against Paras Pharma's 'Moov' brand: (Spicy IP),India: Patents on ARV drugs could increase costs: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP),US: Survey… [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]