Search for: "Gentry v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 291
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2012, 9:52 am
The case is yet another example where an appellate court considered the impact of the landmark United States Supreme Court decision in Concepcion v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:48 am
Supreme Court and Gentry v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:41 am
In Iskanian v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 5:41 pm
Gentry, 14 M.J. 209 (C.M.A. 1982) (summary disposition); United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:07 am
Carter concluded that in the employment context, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Gentry v. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 11:04 am
The holding is unremarkable, in that it comes from the same district that also upheld such waivers in Gentry v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:59 am
See Gentry v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 5:05 pm
Superior Court (State Farm Mutual Insurance), Banda v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
Recently I came across the following headnote: "Gentry v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:50 am
(quoting Gentry v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 6:14 pm
In Iskanian, the California Supreme Court will decide whether Concepcion overruled the unconscionability jurisprudence of Gentry v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 2:16 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 4:00 pm
In Gentry v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:00 am
Sonic cites as controlling authority the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Preston v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:27 am
State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Assoc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 11:46 am
According to Public Justice, a pro-consumer lawyers group, class action bans have been successfully challenged in several states: The California Supreme Court held earlier this year held that a class action arbitration waiver might be contrary to public policy (Gentry v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 9:26 am
The court looked to a recent case, Gentry v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 7:00 am
The case also awaits determination of Gentry v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 9:41 am
By Eric Goldman The Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]