Search for: "George v. Tate"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
George v [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
Other celebrities, including Spice Girl Melanie C, comedians Catherine Tate and Keith Allen and radio presenter Chris Moyles, have received “substantial damages” and public apologies from NGN, the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
On the same day, the same court handed down judgment in George v Bella Bella Community School Society, 2023 BCSC 1767. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:15 pm
The post JABARI JAHI TATE v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:52 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 3:55 am
Nina Totenberg reports at NPR that, “[w]ith the county awash in protests over the death of George Floyd, the U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2020] EWCA Civ 104 (heard 21 and 22 January 2020). [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 4 to 7 February 2020 Warby J heard the trial in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:03 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court invited Paul Clement, who served as U.S. solicitor general under President George W. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Hansen Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Knick v. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 10:38 am
Circuit denied a motion for an initial en banc hearing in Qassim v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 11:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:33 am
”The relevant case law for commandments 1 to 10 seems to be: Fylde Microsystems Ltd v Key Radio Systems Ltd [1998] FSR 449 Levy v Rutley (1871) (1871) LR 6 CP Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503 Wiseman v George Weidenfeld & Nicolson Ltd [1985] FSR 525 Fylde… [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:25 am
”The relevant case law for commandments 1 to 10 seems to be: Fylde Microsystems Ltd v Key Radio Systems Ltd [1998] FSR 449 Levy v Rutley (1871) (1871) LR 6 CP Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503 Wiseman v George Weidenfeld & Nicolson Ltd [1985] FSR 525 Fylde Microsystems Ltd v… [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 2:04 am
In concluding that Kogan had not sufficiently contributed to the screenplay [para 85], even by adding to the first three drafts, Hacon J considered the following points and authorities: Adding elements not themselves covered by copyright, such as scenic effects, is not a sufficient contribution (as per Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503)Providing helpful criticism and expert feedback on the work is not a sufficient contribution (as per Wiseman v George… [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 9:55 pm
Gregory George, No. 112,224 (Leavenworth)Motion for DNA testing (petition for review)Christina M. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:30 am
This collection shows how important it is, despite the constant temptation to compression, not to lose sight of the contexts and nuances which qualify and illuminate so many leading authorities.TOC after the jump. 1 R v Pease (1832) MARK WILDE AND CHARLOTTE SMITH2 Burón v Denman (1848) CHARLES MITCHELL AND LESLIE TURANO3 George v Skivington (1869) DAVID IBBETSON4 Daniel v Metropolitan Railway Company (1871) MICHAEL LOBBAN5 Woodley v… [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
