Search for: "George v. Tate" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2020, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Nina Totenberg reports at NPR that, “[w]ith the county awash in protests over the death of George Floyd, the U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2020] EWCA Civ 104 (heard 21 and 22 January 2020). [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 4 to 7 February 2020 Warby J heard the trial in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the Supreme Court invited Paul Clement, who served as U.S. solicitor general under President George W. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 10:38 am by Mikhaila R. Fogel
Circuit denied a motion for an initial en banc hearing in Qassim v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:33 am by Ben
”The relevant case law for commandments 1 to 10 seems to be:        Fylde Microsystems Ltd v Key Radio Systems Ltd [1998] FSR 449         Levy v Rutley (1871) (1871) LR 6 CP         Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503       Wiseman v George Weidenfeld & Nicolson Ltd [1985] FSR 525        Fylde… [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:25 am
”The relevant case law for commandments 1 to 10 seems to be:         Fylde Microsystems Ltd v Key Radio Systems Ltd [1998] FSR 449         Levy v Rutley (1871) (1871) LR 6 CP         Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503       Wiseman v George Weidenfeld & Nicolson Ltd [1985] FSR 525        Fylde Microsystems Ltd v… [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 2:04 am
In  concluding that Kogan had not sufficiently contributed to the screenplay [para 85], even by adding to the first three drafts, Hacon J considered the following points and authorities:  Adding elements not themselves covered by copyright, such as scenic effects, is not a sufficient contribution (as per Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503)Providing helpful criticism and expert feedback on the work is not a sufficient contribution (as per Wiseman v George… [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
This collection shows how important it is, despite the constant temptation to compression, not to lose sight of the contexts and nuances which qualify and illuminate so many leading authorities.TOC after the jump. 1 R v Pease (1832) MARK WILDE AND CHARLOTTE SMITH2 Burón v Denman (1848) CHARLES MITCHELL AND LESLIE TURANO3 George v Skivington (1869) DAVID IBBETSON4 Daniel v Metropolitan Railway Company (1871) MICHAEL LOBBAN5 Woodley v… [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:45 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta examined whether the Justice Department subtlely admitted doubts over Trump’s oath in its brief on appeal in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:08 am by Roy Black
No Island of Sanity: Paula Jones v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:41 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Wainwright.Last June, that court applied the Tate precedent to summarily reverse a grant of collateral relief to George Toca. [read post]