Search for: "Georgia v. Cohen" Results 81 - 100 of 188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
Coca Cola and Delta prominently criticized Georgia’s restrictive voting laws. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
Coca Cola and Delta prominently criticized Georgia’s restrictive voting laws. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:56 pm by Colin O'Keefe
" SCAM - West Des Moines lawyer Steve Lombardi on his blog, The Iowa Edict Bowoto v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and if so how it is applied, careful… [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Meyer, Co-Chairs of the Research Forum; and Ingrid Wuerth of Vanderbilt University Law School and Midyear Meeting Host Committee member Harlan Cohen of Georgia Law, who will serve as inaugural Co-Chairs of the Society's new regional project, ASIL-Southeast. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Sunday, September 15, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Fintechs, Regulations, Risks SEC Dismisses In-House Proceedings Against Accountants Following Jarkesy Posted by David Peavler and Evan Singer, Jones Day, on Monday, September 16, 2024 Tags: Rule 102(e), SEC, SEC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Sunday, September 15, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Fintechs, Regulations, Risks SEC Dismisses In-House Proceedings Against Accountants Following Jarkesy Posted by David Peavler and Evan Singer, Jones Day, on Monday, September 16, 2024 Tags: Rule 102(e), SEC, SEC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 29 November 2017 the Supreme Court heard the appeal in the “forum shopping” case of Goldhar v Haaretz. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
For the Georgia case’s purposes, the most relevant is Supremacy Clause immunity. [read post]