Search for: "Georgia v. Kelley"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2012, 4:40 am
" O'Kelley v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court of Georgia answered this question in Synovus Bank v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 5:10 am
Recently, the Georgia Business Court was faced with a similar question in Cameron Martin v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 10:59 am
& Lectra S.A. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:22 am
& Lectra S.A. v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 9:13 am
Nevertheless, one decision over the past few years, Cellairis v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 12:59 am
However, the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Georgia applied Georgia law in LifeBrite Labs., LLC v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
In Royal v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
Hawk Communications, LLC, a 2004 Lanham Act case that we brought in the Northern District of Georgia. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 9:17 am
Kelley Col, 56 F.3d 1538 (1995) (en banc) (citing Garretson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:01 am
Kelley v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 11:58 am
In Jance v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:51 pm
Ga.), filed on July 17, 2012 by KV against the Georgia Department of Community Health challenging the latter’s formal prior authorization policy favoring compounded HPC formulations over Makena® (ongoing; preliminary injunction granted in favor of KV on August 9, 2012); (2) K-V Pharmaceutical Co., et al. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:20 pm
Cl. 2021) (citing Georgia Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 4:26 am
The original Engle v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm
O’Kelley 19-956Issues: (1) Whether a panel decision decided nine days before the relevant conduct in question constitutes clearly established law to deprive government officers of qualified immunity; (2) whether timing constitutes an extraordinary circumstance as articulated by Harlow v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 6:08 pm
Georgia 12/10/08SONY BMG Music v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
– Legal marketing expert Paula Black on her In Black and White blog FunnyJunk v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and if so how it is applied, careful… [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Clay v. [read post]
