Search for: "German v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 4:52 pm
Footnotes[+] Footnotes ↑1 Strain v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 4:04 am
US discovery is a bone of contention between Germany and the United States. [read post]
5 May 2012, 4:04 am
US discovery is a bone of contention between Germany and the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am
On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:58 pm
The latest volume of the German Yearbook of International Law (Vol. 64, 2021) is out. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
The patient’s data may be used by the developer of the health app only: for the intended use of the health app and for the reimbursement procedure; to prove the benefit of the application (in the framework of specific procedures regulated under Book V of the Social Security Code); to comply with legal obligations imposed by the EU Medical Devices Regulation 2017/745 and the German Medical Devices Implementation Act, and to ensure, on an ongoing basis, the technical… [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:21 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:16 am
Similar to Abbott v Dexcom, the key reason for the present application was to avoid the German injunction gap (an issue explained in detail in Abbott v Dexcom, [33]). [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:32 am
One such matter was Eureko v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day rejoices in the name Johannes Baumgartner Wirtschafts-und-Vermögensberatung GmbH v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 7:50 am
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California).That's why I just can't help but share a soundbite from today's Nokia v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:54 pm
The reasoning of the CJEU in GAT v LuK was equally applicable here. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 1:57 am
Directive 98/34 requires in fact Member States to notify the European Commission of any “technical regulations” that they intend to adopt. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 2:56 am
The judges state that the library user may rely on Sec. 53 UrhG when using the library terminal. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:23 am
In the case of C‑582/14 Breyer v Bundesrepublik Deutschland the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has delivered another landmark judgment concerning the proper characterisation of IP addresses and the compatibility of German national law with Article 7(f) of the Data Protection Directive (DPD). [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:50 am
The German Federal Constitutional Court’s judgment on CETA On 13 October 2016, the German Federal Constitutional Court (the Court, FCC) issued its much-awaited judgment on the request for temporary legal protection against CETA. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:57 am
The case is Facebook Inc. and Facebook Ireland Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 12:26 am
Scrutinizer GmbH, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, No. 18-1195, 13 September 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 6:51 am
In White v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 3:21 am
As in Scheck v. [read post]
