Search for: "Gibson v. District of Columbia"
Results 41 - 60
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2012, 6:29 am
District Court, District of Columbia (Washington). [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am
Cooper District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:05 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that they couldn’t, finding that it was a violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as the McCain–Feingold Act). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
To be sure, Bickel was more than willing to defend Brown v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am
Many of the other attorneys in this figure are well known to the court, yet several of the state government attorneys, including Loren AliKhan for the District of Columbia, David Franklin for Illinois and Matthew McGuire for Virginia, each argued their first cases before the court this term. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Law, Life and Government in Red River, by Dale Gibson, published by McGill Queen’s University Press. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:02 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that they couldn’t, finding that it was a violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as the McCain–Feingold Act). [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that they couldn’t, finding that it was a violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as the McCain–Feingold Act). [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
This conference brings you the latest updates and developments in light of such things as the Digital Single Market, the Investigatory Powers Bill, and the legal implications of Brexit Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Ziggy Mosslmani, a Sydney man who sued for defamation after being ridiculed online because of his mullet, has suffered a setback in his case as District Court judge Judith Gibson struck out the teenager’s imputations of ridicule… [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:55 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that they couldn’t, finding that it was a violation of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as the McCain–Feingold Act). [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
In Righthaven LLC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm
Neal Kayal’s firm, Hogan Lovells, is atop this figure with four such wins, followed by Gibson Dunn, Kirkland & Ellis, Texas’ S.G. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
Reynolds and Altria in Gelep v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Des Moines Independent Community School District et al. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In Frisby v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
