Search for: "Gibson v. Gibson" Results 1 - 20 of 1,691
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2021, 6:19 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of evidence — First degree murder Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Washington County, Rahim Gibson (“Gibson”), Appellant, was convicted of first-degree murder, first-degree assault, second-degree assault, reckless endangerment, and use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:53 am by Steve Chang (Gamertag: BookEmDano 5 0)
It seems that Gibson’s efforts to enforce its musical concert participation patent (U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 4:32 pm
As previously reported, Gibson asserts that Activision's Guitar Hero franchise infringes on some Gibson patents. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 6:19 am
Not surprising in view of the court's claim construction that heavily favored Activision, it appears that Gibson and Activision have settled this case. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 7:19 pm
Gibson is asserting that it has a patent on a musical performance simulation, which Gibson alleges Activision infringes via its popular Guitar Hero games.The lawsuit was filed in the Central District of California. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:29 pm by scanner1
GIBSON, and the PRAIRIE DRIVE SUBDIVISION HOME OWNER’S ASSOCIATION, a Montana corporation, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:00 pm by Carey Sias
As a young lawyer, Gibson appeared before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court three times: Commonwealth v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm by Carey Sias
As a young lawyer, Gibson appeared before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court three times: Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:51 am by traceydennis
Gibson and others v Sheffield City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 63; [2010] WLR (D) 47 “In an equal pay claim, it was open to an employer to avoid the need for objective justification of a pay disparity if he could show that, even if the pay practice had an adverse impact on women, that practice was not tainted by sex discrimination under s 1(3) of the Equal Pay Act 1970, so that the obligation to justify the disparity objectively did not arise. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 8:13 am by Mandour & Associates
IPNews® - Viacom International Inc. urged a Los Angeles judge to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Gibson Guitar Corp. for infringing a trademarked “Flying V” electric guitar, claiming that the allegedly infringing ukuleles were never sold in the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:00 am by sally
Gibson and Others v Sheffield City Council Court of Appeal “Merely because an employer could explain a pay disparity, which was not directly discriminatory, that did not necessarily mean that the pay practice was not tainted by sex discrimination, so that the employer would have to justify that disparity objectively in order to rely on the genuine material factor defence in an equal pay claim. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 2:42 am
Regina (Kelly) v Secretary of State for Justice; Regina (Bailey) v Same; Regina (Gibson) v Governor of Wymott Prison Court of Appeal “In the criminal sentencing context, the court could read words into a statutory instrument to correct a drafting omission. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
In her concluding remarks Judith Gibson notes that Early decisions, such as Dow-Jones and Company v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575 at [75] – [92], appear not to have appreciated that the Internet was not just another form of television or radio. [read post]