Search for: "Gibson v. Gibson"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2017, 4:36 pm
*Judith Gibson is the Defamation List Judge at the NSW District Court. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 11:42 am
It remains to be seen whether those new claims become the new center of attention going forward.The case is Gibson Guitar Corp. v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:28 pm
Gibson is claiming that Viacom and its licensee both infringed on its “Flying V” trademark. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 2:29 am
The case is titled Activision Publishing, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:14 am
For publication opinions today (6): In Donna Gibson v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:32 am
One of the first posts on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION ® was about Gibson Guitar Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:40 am
Gibson, January 14, 2010 [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:13 pm
In Cohen v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 7:41 pm
By Eric Goldman Gibson v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:22 am
Blawgletter suspects that the repudiation of Conley v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:44 am
See Falconer v. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 12:03 pm
One of the first posts on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® was about Gibson Guitar Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From last week's California Court of Appeal decision in Cusi v. [read post]
Keep On Rockin' In The Virtual World--Guitar Hero Videogame Does Not Infringe Gibson Guitar's Patent
3 Apr 2009, 9:46 am
However, this virtual reality was endangered last year by a threatened patent infringement lawsuit by guitar company, Gibson, longtime maker of iconic rock guitars such as the Gibson “Les Paul,” “SG,” “ES-335,” and “Flying V,” to name a few. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:47 am
Today, in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:47 am
Today, in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
Gibson Guitar Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 2:02 pm
But is there a part of me that says that it would be socially beneficial -- and, moreover, beneficial for everyone involved (plaintiffs and defendants alike) -- if Paula Gibson were persuaded to leave the A.G.'s office, either through a fee award or otherwise? [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:44 am
Led by my colleague Elizabeth Gibson, four members of the National Bankruptcy Conference have produced a fantastic analysis of the Stern v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm
First, Dr Rolph identifies problems in the Lange (Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520) defence, noting it was not followed in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Pty Ltd [2001] 2 AC 227, a decision which the Australian courts have in turn refused to recognise, and which the High Court of Australia has declined opportunities to consider ever since, despite hinting at it in 2002: Skalkos v Assaf [2002] HCA Trans 649 (13 December 2002). [read post]
