Search for: "Gibson v. McDonald" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2015, 9:21 am by Nassiri Law
In Betts .v McDonald’s Corp., a large restaurant chain was named as a defendant by 10 Hispanic and African American men who allege their termination by a franchisee of three Virginia-based restaurants amounts to racial discrimination. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
The trial court's original order entering the jury verdict is available on Westlaw as Liebeck v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am by Jani
As was stated by Lord Justice Gibson in Asprey & Garrard Ltd v WRA (Guns) Ltd: "...the defence has never been held to apply to names of new companies as otherwise a route to piracy would be obvious". [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm by Blog Editorial
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
Winston Gibson v Public Service Commission; Ranjan Rampersad v Commissioner of Police and Police Service Commission; Robert Ramsahai v Teaching Service Commission; Ashford Sankar & Others v Public Service Commission; Gopichand Ganga and Others v Commissioner of Police and Others; and Hermia Tyson-Cuffie v Public Service Commission (Trinidad and Tobago), heard 17 – 19 May 2011. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Blog Editorial
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Gibson: you don’t have to reject the contract theory to reject it in TM. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm by Blog Editorial
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:02 am
"The first clause has prompted some to wonder whether Madison knew of Donaldson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The 9th Circuit in Bosley v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 26, 2009)Affirming dismissal of fem manager's sex/discharge suitDC CircuitDouglas v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
Two days later, Judge Gibson dismissed proceedings in Zimmerman v Perkiss (No.2) [2022] NSWDC 458. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:19 am by Rob Robinson
Follow @InfoGovernance eDiscovery News Content and Considerations 9th Circuit Rules E-Mail Is Not an 'Electronically Printed' Receipt - http://tinyurl.com/3ky74h2 (Nate Raymond) Bad eDiscovery Costs $60 Million Per Year - http://tinyurl.com/3z9lja6 (Lawdable) Careless Preservers Breathe Sigh of Relief when Court Finds no Relevant Info Destroyed - http://tinyurl.com/3kcewp4 (Michael Tucker) Catch Me if You Can: Guarding Firm Data From Insider Trading - http://tinyurl.com/3bfp969 (Tam… [read post]