Search for: "Giglio v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2017, 5:59 am by The Swartz Law Firm
The parties (United States Attorney) joined in the defendant jointly agreed that the conviction should be vacated because he provided false testimony at the trial. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:59 am by The Swartz Law Firm
The parties (United States Attorney) joined in the defendant jointly agreed that the conviction should be vacated because he provided false testimony at the trial. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am by Alex Loomis
Conceding that no cases were directly on point, Connell cites United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:57 am by Jonathan Abel
Although Supreme Court cases like United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 11:05 am by Cody M. Poplin
Carter also announced that the United States and the Philippines plan to conduct regular joint patrols of the South China Sea. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:33 am by SHG
United States v Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985). [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 12:52 pm by John Floyd
Beyond that, we have what I described elsewhere as an ‘epidemic of Brady violations abroad in the land,’ a phrase that has brought much controversy but brought about little change in the way prosecutors operate in the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
Rule 16(a)(6) is a catchall clause that requires the government to “[a]dvise the defendant’s attorney of evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment to which defendant is entitled pursuant to Brady and United States v. [read post]