Search for: "Gilmore v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 75
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2018, 10:28 am by Ken White
Here, Stranahan discloses his facts, which are undisputed: Gilmore had a picture of the Heyer and referred to her as a martyr, and Gilmore works for the State Department. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Zuri Blackmon
I said their commercials usually misrepresent the present state of tax collection, with remarks like “The IRS is coming down harder than before. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:40 am by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
Gilmore Liquidating, 651 So. 2d 1282, 1283 (remanding for jury determination of a FDUTPA claim because a car dealer sold a vehicle for almost five thousand dollars more than the market rate after false claims that the vehicle was a limited-edition model). [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 1:20 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
“The law must make it clear to governments around the world that any illegal attack in the United States will be answered in court in the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 5:55 pm by Nate Cardozo
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Thursday, when EFF, human rights lawyer Scott Gilmore, and the law firms of Jones Day and Robins Kaplan went to court in Kidane v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 3:46 pm by Karen Gullo
” “Giving Ethiopia immunity for state-sponsored hacking would strip away one of the few protections Americans have against cyberattacks by foreign powers,” said Scott Gilmore, counsel at Guernica 37. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:31 am by Rebecca Jeschke
Opsahl is EFF's lead attorney on its cases challenging National Security Letters (NSLs) and recently argued against the NSLs' unconstitutional gag provisions in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:41 pm
Co., a 1957 opinion from the United States Supreme Court that seems pretty on point. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 5:45 am
Gilmore, concerning the application of the Vienna Convention on the Consular Relations, and United States v. [read post]