Search for: "Ginsberg v. New York" Results 21 - 40 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2018, 1:36 pm by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
The employment attorneys at the Resnick Law Group’s are available to help you if you are involved in a dispute with an employer in New Jersey or New York. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:09 am by Phil Dixon
Indeed, restrictions on intelligence sharing between surveillance agencies and law enforcement have been loosened in recent times according to this New York Times story. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 10:01 am by David Post
  The doctrinal problem, for opponents of the law (like us), is that the Court some time ago, in Ginsberg v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:19 am by Edwin Moloy
  He served as an Associate Council to Independent Counsel Lawrence Walsh during the Iran-Contra affair, then as Assistant District Attorney in New York’s Eastern District before becoming an author and legal analyst for various news outlets. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:08 am by rhapsodyinbooks
[citations omitted]” In a cogent article for The New York Review of Books, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote about the decision in what amounted to a strong endorsement of Justice Ginsberg’s dissent. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:06 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
On Sunday, New York Times columnist Frank Bruni pointed out that March 2013 will likely be recalled as "the month when the political balance on this issue shifted unmistakably from risky to safe." [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
Rodriguez v United States (6-3 decision written by Justice Ginsberg) Facts: Officer Struble observed a Mercury Mountaineer veer slowly onto the shoulder of a Nebraska highway for about 1 to 2 seconds and then jerk back onto the road. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 8:31 am
  The New York Times ran a good piece on this today, explaining the need for Congress to fix the Court's ridiculous reading of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 - or as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg put it, "cramped interpretation. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:55 am by Helen White
Defending checks and balances is not partisan: An unconstrained state legislature might benefit republicans in Ohio and bowl them over in New York. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:01 am by Margaret Sachs
    The Supreme Court yesterday issued its decision in Morrison v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:52 am by Amy Howe
    Briefly: In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses the possible options for the Court in the challenges to the  Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage of the decision comes from Chris Geidner at BuzzFeed, Sahil Kapur of Talking Points Memo (here and here), ISCOTUS (video), Adam Liptak of The New York Times, PJTV (which has a video interview with me on the case), and Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm by William Hibbitts | JURIST Staff
Legal expert Benjamin Ginsberg, who represented Republicans in election disputes including Bush v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
The Riegels brought a claim in federal court in New York, which was dismissed by the court, and upheld by the U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:31 am by Chip Merlin
They do this by enforcing clauses that drag policyholders into arbitration in New York, imposing New York law and leveraging potentially biased arbitrators to their advantage. [read post]