Search for: "Ginsberg v. New York" Results 41 - 60 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 8:30 am
The statute defined violent games in a way that "mimics the New York statute regulating obscenity-for-minors that we upheld in Ginsberg v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:34 am by Judith G. McMullen
New York allowed the state to apply an age-adjusted standard for its restriction on the sale of obscene materials to minors.  [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:38 am by Paul Venard
Not only did this language cause the warrant to fail under Fourth Amendment scrutiny, but it also required the officers to execute judgment calls and seize items they should not have.For the article from the New York Times, click here. [read post]
13 May 2013, 4:00 am
O'Connor v Ginsberg, 2013 NY Slip Op 03363, Appellate Division, Third Department In 2009, the Commission on Public Integrity notified the then President and Chief Executive Officer of the State University of New York Research Foundation [CEO] that it had received information indicating that he may have violated Public Officers Law §74 (3) (d), (f) and (h). [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 3:00 am by Andrew Lowy
The case regarded the town council in Greece, New York that, as a matter of practice, began its proceedings with a prayer. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:07 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
Complaint & Trial On September 8, 3008, the textbook publisher, John Wiley & Sons, filed suit in the federal district court in Manhattan (Southern District of New York) claiming copyright infringement (17 U.S.C. § 501) and trademark infringement (15 U.S.C. § 1114(a)) under federal law, and unfair competition under New York state law. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
  The Court denied cert. without comment in the thrice-relisted City of New York v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
Today the Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Golan v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Julie Hilden
New York, which defined a set of materials that is “obscene as to minors,” and Reno v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 12:22 pm by admin
In 1968, the Supreme Court was asked to determine in Ginsberg v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:32 pm by Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
" Sotomayor, a onetime intellectual property lawyer in New York, was viewed as a potential pro-patent vote, but her comments suggested skepticism. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:30 am by Susan Cartier Liebel
Trippe Fried shared the news that InHouse Legal recently opened a New York office. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:36 am by Eugene Volokh
New York, 390 U.S. 629 (1968),] and [FCC v.] [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:27 am by Eugene Volokh
Even though the standards of the law are borrowed largely from similar laws related to the distribution of sexually themed materials to minors (see Ginsberg v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 1:26 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The US Supreme Court has declined to vacate a stay by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals of an injunction granted to Texas prison inmates from the Pack Unit, a geriatric prison unit, reported the New York Times. [read post]