Search for: "Ginsberg v. New York" Results 41 - 60 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2020, 1:33 pm by Phil Dixon
Bivens has been applied to Fourth and Fifth Amendment claims before in the context of illegal search and arrest in New York City, and to sex discrimination by a congressman in Washington, D.C. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am by Russell Spivak
The government appealed that decision by Judge Alvin Hellerstein of the Southern District of New York. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
” [Jesse Walker] Tags: Donald Trump, free speech, hate speech, New York Times, transgender, United Kingdom [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:56 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
And lest you think the Los Angeles Times and the New York Times took Justice Ginsberg out of context, you can watch the entire interview to see for your self. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:38 am by Paul Venard
Not only did this language cause the warrant to fail under Fourth Amendment scrutiny, but it also required the officers to execute judgment calls and seize items they should not have.For the article from the New York Times, click here. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:34 am by Judith G. McMullen
New York allowed the state to apply an age-adjusted standard for its restriction on the sale of obscene materials to minors. [read post]
13 May 2013, 4:00 am
O'Connor v Ginsberg, 2013 NY Slip Op 03363, Appellate Division, Third Department In 2009, the Commission on Public Integrity notified the then President and Chief Executive Officer of the State University of New York Research Foundation [CEO] that it had received information indicating that he may have violated Public Officers Law §74 (3) (d), (f) and (h). [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 am by Lyle Denniston
  (The old cases were Original 1, 2 and 3, Wisconsin-Michigan-New York, et al., v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
  The Court denied cert. without comment in the thrice-relisted City of New York v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
Today the Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Golan v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Julie Hilden
New York, which defined a set of materials that is “obscene as to minors,” and Reno v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:30 am
The statute defined violent games in a way that "mimics the New York statute regulating obscenity-for-minors that we upheld in Ginsberg v. [read post]