Search for: "Gist v. French" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2011, 4:29 pm by Marty Schwimmer
So, that brings us to the Louboutin v YSL case. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 12:39 am
The dispute over the unauthorized publication of the private etchings of Prince Albert and the recognition of a right in confidences was still over 50 years away (Prince Albert v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 7:37 am by MBettman
In this case the speed device goes toward the speed which is the essential gist of the element of the whole offense. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:29 am
The gist of the Court of Milan's judgment is as follows. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Marie Taglioni in La SylphideThe Paris Commercial Court goes two for two with today’s case of the day, L’Institute National De L’Audiovisuel v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 11:34 pm by Florian Mueller
It was originally supposed to be about various motions, and Judge Curiel made it clear that all those Rule 44.1 motions relating to questions under French law (governing the ETSI FRAND declaration) were basically summary judgment motions in disguise and he'd need more time to rule on them. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
The first Zurich IP Retreat was held on Friday/Saturday 8/9 September 2017 on the shores of lake Zurich, organized by INGRES and ETH Zurich, in honour of Dr. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
Each volume covers a particular topic: v.1 (International Law and the Law of the European Communities; v.2 (Freedom of Speech); v.3 (Questions of Law Arising from German Unification); v.4 (The Law of Freedom of Faith and the Law of Freedom of the Churches); v.5 (Family-Related Decisions). [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This seems to be the prevailing view from Michael McConnell, Akhil Amar, Jeffrey Rosen, Mark Movsesian, David French, and others. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
So many people have been emailing the IPKat to ask him if he has seen yesterday's General Court decision in Case T-332/10 Viaguara v OHIM - Pfizer (VIAGUARA) that he's beginning to worry if they are trying to tell him something. [read post]