Search for: "Givens v. Allstate Insurance Company" Results 1 - 20 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2017, 7:26 am
 In the court's opinion, this was sufficient to raise a question of fact regarding what plaintiffs advised the agent and whether there was a failure by Allstate's agent to follow company protocol or notify Allstate of the change in use, given their move to the in-laws' residence for that prolonged period of time. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 2:51 pm by Pamela Fasick
A Proration Clause Based Upon Insurance Code Section 11580.2(d) Prevents the Application Of An Excess Insurance Clause in Another Applicable PolicyAllstate Insurance Company v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 7:10 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Allstate Insurance Company brought the matter before the court by way of a Motion for Summary Judgment which was denied by the court. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:48 am
Since unambiguous terms in an insurance contract are given their plain and ordinary meaning (see Antoine v City of New York, 56 AD3d 583, 584), L & B is an additional insured under the Allstate policy for claims arising from defective conditions on the sidewalk in front of the premises. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:48 am by Evan Schwartz
The court held that Allstate complied with the terms of the contract and therefore was not liable for the repair costs.3 As with other contracts, the terms of an insurance policy dictate whether coverage applies in a given situation. [read post]