Search for: "Givens v. Allstate Insurance Company" Results 1 - 20 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2007, 2:51 pm by Pamela Fasick
A Proration Clause Based Upon Insurance Code Section 11580.2(d) Prevents the Application Of An Excess Insurance Clause in Another Applicable PolicyAllstate Insurance Company v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:48 am
Since unambiguous terms in an insurance contract are given their plain and ordinary meaning (see Antoine v City of New York, 56 AD3d 583, 584), L & B is an additional insured under the Allstate policy for claims arising from defective conditions on the sidewalk in front of the premises. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:48 am by Evan Schwartz
The court held that Allstate complied with the terms of the contract and therefore was not liable for the repair costs.3 As with other contracts, the terms of an insurance policy dictate whether coverage applies in a given situation. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 1:50 pm by Tobin Admin
At the time of the accident, the defendant was insured under an Allstate policy. [read post]