Search for: "Givens v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 53,285
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2009, 2:38 am
Apostolides v Orams and Another Court of Justice of the European Communities “The fact that a judgment given in a member state of the European Community concerned land in a part of that state over which the state did not exercise effective control did not mean that the judgment was not subject to recognition and enforcement in [...] [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On 15-16 July the Supreme Court heard the case of United States of America v Nolan regarding the respondent’s redundancy following the closure of her US military base, RSA Hythe. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 1:12 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection and another; [2008] WLR (D) 129 “Where a public official reasonably believed that information had been given under a statutory procedure in circumstances which gave rise at that time to a reasonable expectation of privacy, and the statute prohibited disclosure for purposes other than those to which the Act related, that information was exempt from disclosure under the… [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 2:25 am
Regina (Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council and Another) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Court of Appeal “Proposals to replace two-tier local government in some parts of the country with unitary authorities, made before the necessary statutory powers were in place, were lawful as long as genuine reconsideration had been given to them after the commencement of the relevant Act. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 8:15 am
The Oregon Supreme Court decided on Friday, 6/1/07, in State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of United States v Aguilar United States District Judge Robert Aguilar was convicted of one count of illegally disclosing a wiretap in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 10:38 pm by Solomon L. Wisenberg
What is particularly galling about the offense instructions given to the jury in United States v. [read post]