Search for: "Glasgow v. Mitchell"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2009, 2:03 am
Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11; [2009] WLR (D) 65 “Where a local housing authority summoned one of its tenants, who had been abusing and threatening one of his neighbours, to a meeting at which he was told that he could face eviction if his behaviour did not improve and the tenant left the [...] [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 3:27 am
Mitchell and Another v Glasgow City Council House of Lords “Local housing authority landlords were under no duty to warn a neighbour who had received death threats from an abusive tenant that a meeting had been arranged at which he was warned that he would be evicted unless his behaviour improved, after which the abusive tenant inflicted [...] [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 10:09 am
The House of Lords will be giving judgment in Glasgow CC v Mitchell on Wednesday 18 Feb 09 (link is to a .pdf). [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
Glasgow City Council v Mitchell [2009] UKHL 11 This is a Scottish appeal to the House of Lords on the scope of the duties owed - if any - by landlords in respect of the behavior of their tenants. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 2:36 am
RB (Algeria) (FC) and another (Appellants) v Secretary of State for the Home Department OO (Jordan) (Original Respondent and Cross-appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) [2009] UKHL 10 (18 February 2009) Mitchell (AP) and another (Original Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Glasgow City Council (Original Appellant and Cross-respondents) (Scotland) [2009] UKHL [...] [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:43 am
X & Y did not get permission to go to the House of Lords, presumably because the Lords had just decided in Glasgow CC v Mitchell. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:43 am
X & Y did not get permission to go to the House of Lords, presumably because the Lords had just decided in Glasgow CC v Mitchell. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:43 am
X & Y did not get permission to go to the House of Lords, presumably because the Lords had just decided in Glasgow CC v Mitchell. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:12 am
Those feelings were only strengthened by the decision of the House of Lords in Glasgow CC v Mitchell. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:47 am
However, following the Supreme Court judgment in Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] 1 AC 874, that claim was withdrawn. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:13 am
Those proceedings were concerned with the duties of a coroner, particularly where the death had occurred before the Human Rights Act 1998 had come into force.Ms Hurst had also commenced civil proceedings against the police and the local authority, but these were discontinued on the advice of her legal representatives based on Brooks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Van Colle v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire in the Court of Appeal – probably justifiably so,… [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:13 am
Those proceedings were concerned with the duties of a coroner, particularly where the death had occurred before the Human Rights Act 1998 had come into force.Ms Hurst had also commenced civil proceedings against the police and the local authority, but these were discontinued on the advice of her legal representatives based on Brooks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Van Colle v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire in the Court of Appeal – probably justifiably so,… [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:11 am
Great Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Anor, heard 11 November 2014. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm
There was X v Hounslow,and Glasgow City Council v Mitchell. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:15 am
Great Glasgow Health Board v Doogan & Anor, heard 11 November 2014. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 3:44 pm
These include films on The Home Report, one about windfarming on croft land and another on the House of Lords case: Moncrieff v Jamieson (featuring SSCL Chair Iain G Mitchell QC). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:26 pm
" Further, an operational obligation arises only where the authority knows, or ought to know, of a "real and immediate risk" to the life of the particular individual: see the House of Lords decision in Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm
In O’Rourke v Camden LBC (1998) AC 188, the H [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
In Gorham et al. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
