Search for: "Glass v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 1,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2011, 8:59 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Criminal Procedure Discovery; in camera inspections Saterus Glass appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on his no contest plea to two counts of being a party to the crime of burglary and from a judgment of conviction of first-degree sexual assault of a child, incest with a child, and second-degree sexual assault entered on a jury [...] [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 8:20 am by Unreported Opinions
STATE OF MARYLAND appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:52 am by Randall Holbrook
Court of Appeals in New York City affirmed the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Apple, finding that the IONEX mark was weak, the parties sold very different products to very different customers, and that there was no evidence of bad faith or of actual confusion in the (Saxon Glass Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 10:06 pm by Sarah Waldeck
  She sent her letter,  Glass responded, and for a while all seemed to be quiet. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:25 am by Daniel Gilman
Her departure, and her stated reasons therefore, were not encouraging for those of us who would prefer to see the FTC function as a stable, economically grounded, and genuinely bipartisan independent agency. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 4:05 pm
Gore through the looking glass. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 12:28 pm by Stikeman Elliott LLP
While Glass Lewis does not generally recommend that shareholders withhold votes from chief executives that chair the board, the guidelines state that the roles should be separated. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 5:30 am by Alden Abbott
Supreme Court most recently stressed, in 2005’s Volvo v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:46 am by Gene Quinn
The Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit and ruled that 28 U.S.C. 1400(b) remains the only applicable patent venue statute, that 28 U.S.C. 1391(c) did not modify or amend 1400(b) or the Court's 1957 ruling in Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]