Search for: "Glass v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 1,628
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am by INFORRM
High Court The claimants in Fearn owned extensively glassed flats which faced a viewing platform surrounding the Tate Modern. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:23 am
September 17, 2020 - 2 PM: Brittex Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 6:54 am by Eric Goldman
The advertisement states, “Compare Our Dumpster Smasher–No Franchise Fees, Higher ROI. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am by Camilla Hrdy
  In other words, maybe the consumer buys BRAINSTRONG anyway, even if she knows there is a high chance it won't work or even a small chance it might hurt her.My favorite example of the "materiality" limitation on the deceptiveness bar is the GLASS WAX trademark upheld in Gold Seal Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:58 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals rules that the search that produced narcotics was illegal.The case is United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 1:38 pm by Stuart Kaplow
“What [the bill] really is referring to is these big, glass buildings today that literally threaten the existence of birds because birds fly into the glass, unable to realize that it is glass, and they are dying by the millions as a result of these big, glass buildings,” said County Council chair, Deb Jung, who sponsored the bill. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:07 am by Michael Cannan
In a specified perils policy, your insurance carrier explicitly states the causes of property damage, or perils, that it covers. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Kristian Soltes
As a result, indirect purchaser class actions in the United States often are not certified for class treatment under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) or comparable class action rules in state courts. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:48 pm by Rohit De
Kashmir, was a semi-autonomous princely state in 1947 operating outside of colonial law, soon to be drawn into a long drawn out international conflict between India and Pakistan with successive emergency regimes in both Indian and Pakistani administered Kashmir. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, if the losing party does not appeal an adverse judgment in a prior case between the same parties, that party cannot assert the claim in another lawsuit (see Cohen v Glass, 173 AD3d 580, 580 [1st Dept 2019]). [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm by Adam Rosenthal and Robert Foster
  According to the FMCSA, commercial trucking employers who meet those requirements do not need to comply with state meal and rest period laws because the HOS regulations preempt state law. [read post]