Search for: "Glass v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,628
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2020, 12:21 pm
State v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
They may have a glass of water, but nothing else to eat or drink, unless given permission, may take notes, as long as it does not interfere with the flow of evidence, and have blank paper available. [read post]
9 May 2020, 9:38 am
State of Punjab and Ors. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:02 am
Merricks v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:02 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 8:08 am
Cotto v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 8:42 am
Cotto v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
Posted by David Katz and Sabastian V. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 8:08 pm
In People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:01 am
Emmerich, and Sabastian V. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 5:35 pm
In Loan v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
The U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:32 pm
’ Welsh v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:26 pm
Auth. v State Div. of Human Rights, 78 NY2d 207, 216-217 [1991]; Batavia Lodge No. 196, Loyal Order of Moose v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 35 NY2d 143, 147 [1974]).The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2020/2020_01252.htm [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 11:40 am
In the case at hand, State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:00 pm
While OCA may have a preference for those with a minimal amount of hearing acuity might be a bona fide occupational qualification, the court opined that its preference for hearing acuity without the use of a hearing aid is not.Citing Matter of County of Erie v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 121 AD3d 1564, the Appellate Division noted that "Judicial review of an administrative penalty is limited to whether the measure or mode of penalty ... constitutes an… [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:00 pm
While OCA may have a preference for those with a minimal amount of hearing acuity might be a bona fide occupational qualification, the court opined that its preference for hearing acuity without the use of a hearing aid is not.Citing Matter of County of Erie v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 121 AD3d 1564, the Appellate Division noted that "Judicial review of an administrative penalty is limited to whether the measure or mode of penalty ... constitutes an… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
Krumwiede, et al. v. [read post]
