Search for: "Glass v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 1,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[7]  By “traditional notions,” the Adopting Release refers to other SEC regulations and relevant Supreme Court case law (in particular, TSC Industries v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am by Katharina Schmid (schmid-ip)
The case-law of a Member State, while it is not binding on the EU Courts, may provide relevant indications about the relevant public’s perception of the sign at issue in that state (see para 58, with reference to GC judgment T-40/03 – Julián Murúa Entrena, EU:T:2005:285, para 69). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am by Katharina Schmid (schmid-ip)
The case-law of a Member State, while it is not binding on the EU Courts, may provide relevant indications about the relevant public’s perception of the sign at issue in that state (see para 58, with reference to GC judgment T-40/03 – Julián Murúa Entrena, EU:T:2005:285, para 69). [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Miss Quested believes that she perceived a “shadow” near her, and hit the person with her field glasses;” he pulled her round with the strap and, when it broke, she escaped. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:41 am by Robert B. Lamm
Supreme Court announced its decision in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 12:33 am by Frank Cranmer
And finally…II For any tort/obligations geeks out there: the memorial tablet to Donoghue v Stevenson on the site of the Wellmeadow Café: [read post]
25 May 2024, 11:12 pm by Frank Cranmer
Thibaut Lesseliers, Strasbourg Observers: Föderation der Aleviten Gemeinden in Österreich v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 1:15 pm by Tobin Admin
The CGL Policy identified the named insured as the motorist “dba Mike the Glass Guy,” listed his business as “custom glass work,” and provided $1,000,000 in insurance coverage per occurrence. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm by Larry
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]