Search for: "Godwin v. U.s.*"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2018, 11:30 am
The dismissal in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:59 am
Leiza DolghihAttorney, Godwin Lewis PC The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals started the new year with a quick civil procedure lesson, ruling yesterday in Vantage Drilling Company v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 2:10 pm
Leiza Dolghih Attorney, Godwin Lewis PC The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals is notorious for being pro-business and pro-employer, and its last week’s ruling in Nobach v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:09 pm
Leiza DolghihAttorney, Godwin Lewis PC Last Friday, the Fifth Circuit in Black v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:51 am
* Mike Godwin has left his role as Wikimedia's GC [read post]
When Can a Franchisor Be Liable for Overtime and Minimum Wage Violations at a Franchisee’s Business?
15 Jul 2014, 11:39 am
Given the recent rise in the FLSA litigation and rather sizable penalties and damages awards assessed against the violators, Orozco v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 9:19 am
A short linkwrap: * TechFreedom: Senate Passes Hybrid SESTA Bill, Despite Constitutional & Backfiring Concerns: “This is a new low for Congress…The process that led to this point was appalling” * Open Technology Institute: Congress Erred in Passage of FOSTA, Threatening the Internet and Trafficking Victims: “Though Congress’ intentions are good, its methods are harmful” * NPR All Things Considered: Section 230: A Key Legal Shield For Facebook,… [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:46 am
” The NLRB in MCPc, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:42 am
” United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:05 pm
American Public Health Association et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 7:16 am
” United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
More SESTA-Related Posts: * Debunking Some Myths About Section 230 and Sex Trafficking (Guest Blog Post) * Congress Is About To Ruin Its Online Free Speech Masterpiece (Cross-Post) * Backpage Executives Must Face Money Laundering Charges Despite Section 230–People v. [read post]