Search for: "Gold v. Maxwell"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
Although he has retired officially and unofficially more times than Frank Sinatra, the IPKat's old friend Tibor Gold MBE (right) does have a habit of emerging when you least expect him to do so. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 1:35 pm
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD1641 .K4 2025 V. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
North Carolina, 13-504; Maxwell v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
According to the publisher's (Sweet & Maxwell -- or is it Thomson -- or is it Reuters?) [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:16 am
He contributed to A Practitioner’s Guide to the Law and Regulation of Financial Crime(Sweet & Maxwell 2011). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am
http://bit.ly/LC6ujJ (Mark Ross) Managing Big Data Behind the Firewall: Part 2 - http://bit.ly/PlCXuI (Tom Jenkins) Microsoft Upgrades the Microsoft Outlook Configuration Analyzer Tool – http://bit.ly/PC419b (Casper Manes) Navigating California’s Data Breach Notification Statute - http://bit.ly/LyALjf (Edward Ho, Andres Hurwitz) New Article in ABA Antitrust Magazine Contrasts EU-US Proposals for New Privacy Framewrok - http://bit.ly/LCdI7d (Winston… [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
