Search for: "Golden v. Stone" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2024, 3:02 am by Alessandro Cerri
 The Court held, based on Stone's European Union Design Law, that the "indication of product" wording can be relied upon to resolve an ambiguity as to what is shown in the image in a design registration, and therefore assist in the interpretation of the relevant design. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Justice Stone, who tended to favor the writing of dissents, said that he would dissent only “with real [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
On 29 June 2023, judgment was handed down in R v Dent, 2023 ONCA 460. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 10:09 am by Riana Harvey
A mere simplistic arrangement of non-protectable elements would not demonstrate the level of creativity necessary to warrant protection - as set out in Satava v Lowry. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Inc., 27 NY3d 46, 56 [2016]; Scialdone v Stepping Stones Assoc., L.P., 148 AD3d 953, 954-955 [2017]; Klein v Metropolitan Child Servs., Inc., 100 AD3d 708, 711 [2012]; 42 USC § 1983; CPLR art 14-A). [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 6:21 am
While motives remain opaque, the twin effects of this directed verdict are to establish finality (i.e., ensure there will be no Aruba IV or, more importantly, Aruba V) and, by implication, to set in stone the Vice Chancellor’s findings of fact that implicitly sanction as “reliable” a very, very dirty deal. [8] (more…) [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Inc., 27 NY3d 46, 56 [2016]; Scialdone v Stepping Stones Assoc., L.P., 148 AD3d 953, 954-955 [2017]; Klein v Metropolitan Child Servs., Inc., 100 AD3d 708, 711 [2012]; 42 USC § 1983; CPLR art 14-A). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Inc., 27 NY3d 46, 56; Scialdone v Stepping Stones Assoc., L.P., 148 AD3d 953, 954-955; Klein v Metropolitan Child Servs., Inc., 100 AD3d 708, 711; 42 USC § 1983; CPLR article 14-A). [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:34 am by Peter Groves
Because it expressly excludes ideas from protection, US law requires the judge to go through what has become formalised as a three-step process of abstraction, filtration and comparison - to reduce the work to a copyright-protected "golden nugget" before putting it beside the alleged copy to compare the two. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 11:43 am by jason rwrre
Venue: The Holiday Inn Golden Gateway, 1500 Van Ness Ave., San Francisco, CA 94109, USA. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Cody M. Poplin
Alex Loomis walked us through the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Weinstein v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:33 pm by Bill Otis
 I have to give readers notice that this is rough sledding unless you're made of stone. [read post]