Search for: "Goldstein v. California"
Results 241 - 260
of 560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2016, 3:06 pm
Perhaps the vigor of the Court’s resolution of DIRECTV, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 11:55 pm
’” At the IMLA Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the amicus brief that the State and Local Legal Center filed in Heffernan v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Commentary on Monday’s opinion in DIRECTV v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 11:08 am
With its last opinion of 2015, the Justices added DIRECTV v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 1:54 pm
California, 134 S.Ct. 2473 (2014). [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 2:17 am
Franklin California. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:01 am
Coverage of yesterday’s second argument, Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am
The Court will also hear oral arguments in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 8:00 pm
CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
California Teachers Association — whether non-union members of a public employee union have a First Amendment right not to pay any fees to support union representation activity Tuesday, January 12: Molina-Martinez v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:11 pm
Jacobs v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
Three years ago, after California courts refused to enforce provisions in arbitration agreements that barred class arbitration (on the ground that the provisions were unconscionable), a closely divided court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
At Dorf on Law, Eric Segall looks ahead at Evenwel v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:30 am
Utah v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
Thomas Goldstein of Goldstein & Russell, representing Imburgia, bravely takes on the defense of the California court. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 3:00 pm
Adame v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
” Commentary on Michigan v. [read post]